(I posted the below Quick Analysis of Google Buzz in a Google Buzz post [note? entry?] last night. I’m not sure that’s really the best use for Buzz. Anyhow, it’s re-posted here for full blog glory. There’s more linking, inline pictures, and some slight additions sloshed inside)
I’ve used Google Buzz for one day, starting on my iPhone, and this a review in the only sane way: in Google Buzz.
Well, it’s better than Google Wave. For business, I suspect existing Enterprise 2.0 offerings (and even SAP’s 12sprints) runs circles around Buzz in the area of productivity, but I haven’t used either enough to know first-hand. They can probably copy some features and ideas from Buzz. For consumers, it seems a bit early: just go there if all your friends do.
The technology and implementation are very nice. I’m especially annoyed about claims of what it’ll be in the future as it’s hard to get a feel of how Google prioritizes its road-map and what personal/work technologies I can make based on the “product management” they do. As example: Google Voice, dodgeball, &co.
Doesn’t Google have enough money to buy every user a pony?
For me, the primary benefit of Buzz so far is that it’s integrated into one place. The “Google Suite” is done much better on the iPhone than in the web UI. In fact, Google’s iPhone UIs put their web UX to shame. Each time I use a Google service on the iPhone, I want to just live in it: it makes sense and feels good. (I appended a photo, I have no idea how it shows up in this crazy thing.)
I really like this “suite” direction. Tighter integration between email, IM, document/presentation editing, Twitter, blogging, note taking, video & podcast publishing, to do list management, calendering, and all the other stuff I do with computers and the Internet would be awesome. The integration in my RedMonk Google Apps Google rolls along like a mindless cow heard towards that. If only there was some cowboys to get them to market.
The issue with committing to a suite vs. best-of-breed is older than punch cards. The risk is that you lock into a software offering that fails to innovate, becomes too inflexible to match your evolving needs, and then to top it off, charges you more and more money. We call that “enterprise software” – HA! – I kid, I kid. But seriously, with that cow heard product management feel, I have a cautious view of locking into Google.
Geolocation is pretty cool, but I’ve yet to find mainstream uses that are widely compelling. I used Foursquare for a long time, that was fun until it got boring. Now I use Gowalla and I like being able to pick up Beatniks and watermelons when I’m getting a burger and filling my gas tank.
But, so far, I haven’t gotten much out of geolocation. Coupons would be nice, sure. And if all of my friends – not just my fellow nerds – were using it as much as all my friends use Facebook, I might be able to use geolocation for things like “I want to go get a drink, who’s at a bar right now?”
APIs and OpenWhatever
There were early hopes among us RedMonks that Google Wave’s big deal would be as some API/data center. The protocol was going to be thing. The problem with Wave was that:
- not everyone used it
- it didn’t really do much, and
- UI responsiveness was both weird and slow
Google Buzz seems to be avoiding these problems: the way it auto-discovers people to follow – your social graph or whatever the round-corner cool kids are calling it now-a-days – is fantastic [though the usual privacy freak-outs are cropping up]. And because “everyone” has and uses [or at least looks at] a GMail account, there’s tons of people in there – including many of my non-technical friends, who’re always lacking from the newest Social Distraction Service du jour. There does seem to be plenty of APIs and feeds, but the real test for “open data” will be how well Google Buzz integrates with Twitter [marginally well, though not real-time so far], Facebook, and existing offerings.
One user’s “unique feature” is another developer’s “lock-in.”
I think we’re all beyond this whole “don’t be evil” schtick. Us users get that we’ll have to trade lock-in and closed systems for functionality in the rainbow-land of the cloud. It’d be great if someone (Mozilla?) proved us wrong – rather, brought the closed/open cycle back to open. Until then, it’s iPhone and social-graph lock-in forward. And I got no problem with it: if it helps me do my job, bully!
Google’s Dear John Letter to Facebook
Speaking of “do no evil,” doing business war with other tech companies is clearly not seen as “evil.” Without a doubt, Google is going after page views and eyeballs (man, I hope we start using that term again: the sheer douche baggery of it does so much to highlight what all this Web 2.0 stuff tends to reduce to) that Facebook, Twitter, and others hot-n-trendy .com sites are getting. If you end up spending time in Buzz that you’d otherwise spend in Facebook, it’s a win for Google.
I’ll be curious to see if/how Buzz sucks in Facebook data and interactions. I have no idea if that’s “allowed,” but a blocked attempt to do that would be a great Cold War 2.0 move on Google’s part: remember how well that Google Voice iPhone App thing went? It helped get the FCC on AT&T, roiled everyone in the US up at an opportune time (when the AT&T network was terrible [when?]), and was a nice PR blow at Apple. If Facebook tries to block Google from stealing eyeballs through open APIs, it’s all gravy for the GOOG.
[And, of course, you just have to look at the first (and often after that) message you’re greeted with on the iPhone to see the Apple Dear John:
As Google did with their Google Voice app – which is just dandy too – they’re subverting the “proper” path for iPhone interfaces, using an iPhone tailored web app instead of a native iPhone app. Though, as I recall when the iPhone first came out, before apps, that was the API right?]
Unfortunately, the unified UI is ruined by one of Google’s largest problems: