• Home
  • Blog
  • Who We Are
  • Contact
  • Sponsors
Enterprise Irregulars
Smart Thinking for the Smart Enterprise
  • Featured Posts
  • Business
  • Technology / Software
  • Trends & Concepts
  • Startup Lessons

Emerging Trends

Google's Economic Impact : Next Time It Will Look Different

Google’s Economic Impact : Next Time It Will Look Different

By Sadagopan on May 31, 2010

Google published the first ever “Google’s Economic Impact” report, which estimates that in 2009, Google generated $54 billion of economic activity for advertisers, publishers, and non-profit bodies in the United States. This is done using the AdSense & AdWords frameworks and delivered via paid search clicks, natural search clicks, AdSense revenue sharing, and Google Grants aka charitable donations. The report reveals that Google’s US revenue in 2009 was $11 billion; the $54 billion figure is Google’s computation on how much value Google creates for its partners. The methodology http://goo.gl/dj9B used therein is quite a pioneering one, given that this is the first time that someone is attempting to assess the economic impact of online ads at this scale : the whole internet and who else is better qualified than Google to attempt this.

This is an interesting report, the implications of which will be felt more and more in the years to come. If we reason out that search engines (Google)are in many senses replacing displacing traditional media ad spends, it may be difficult to agree with Google’s $54 billion estimate for its direct economic impact but we have to concede a few things. This is a new growing media, the media, by nature brings in more participation from new class of users and one that may be potentially more ready to spend and the flexibility this provides to advertisers – they can cap daily ad spend and can look at in realtime extending or suspending ads based on clicks and reach. Google’s report primarily depends on the assumption that clicks on natural results drive five times as many leads for businesses as clicks on paid results. However, we believe the indirect impact may be much much more.

I have seen estimates suggesting that Google’s Traffic Acquisition Cost payments to US publisher websites, (as assessed by analysts) at about $3 billion, for an revenue of 11 billion dollars which is now being projected by Google to have an advertiser impact of about $50 plus billion. Lets look at the calculation :
Google calculates the advertiser impact of its search service by assuming that for every dollar spent by an advertiser, the advertiser generates two dollars in sales (and one dollar in “sales minus marketing expense”, which the report calls “profits”) from consumers clicking on the purchased search result, and a further seven dollars in “profits” from consumers clicking on natural search results for the same advertiser, creating an 8X multiplier effect. Thus, claims the report, $7 billion in US-owned and operated revenue should drive $56 billion in economic impact

Now the difficult part:
– Google says that businesses receive an average of five clicks on search results for companies as ads, and by its own conservative standards, estimates that search clicks are about 70 percent as commercially relevant and valuable as ad clicks, and thereby calculates that advertisers receive a total of eight times in surplus what they spend in AdWords. Look carefully here:

– Google assumes that people clicking on links are as inclined to purchase. Any benefit from link clicks has nothing at all to do with having ads. The two are separate events, and a company gets the benefit from search engine optimization and all the work of having a Web site, rapidly increasing the effective cost of using the ads.

– As the Jansen and Spink study states, “More than 80% of web queries are informational in nature and approximately 10% aretransactional, and 10% navigational.” This may lead one to think that the vast majority of clicks need not convert into sales (this is understandable) and so the impact may be less than what is assumed herein.

Thinking deep, it occurs to me it would be tough to embrace or discard Google’s estimated multiplier effect .As noted earlier, Google calculates the advertiser impact of its search service by assuming that for every dollar spent by an advertiser, the advertiser generates one dollar in “sales minus marketing expense” from consumers clicking on the purchased search result, and a further seven dollars from consumers clicking on natural search results for the same advertiser, creating an 8X multiplier effect. Google estimates that one dollar spent on search generates two dollars in advertiser sales via consumer clicks on paid search results. This assessment is centered on the methodology devised by Hal Varian, its Chief Economist, which in its core, assumes that advertisers are spending rationally to buy a certain keyword ranking rather than a higher or lower ranking, and then deriving the implied value which advertisers place on a click. I would think that this resonates well with my intuitive reasoning. Google estimates that one dollar spent on search corresponds to seven dollars in advertiser revenue via consumer clicks on natural search results.

Ideally , Google should have attempted a Lifetime Value assessment to derive the economic impact but rightfuly chooses to center these on transaction basis given the characteristics of the internet media and its limited lifespan. I talked to a few power users of these services (corporate and SMB) and find that for many interenet centric revenue generators, the proportion of their online centric revenue coming out of search engines on an average hover around upwards of 20% in their established and growing phase of business. The informal estimates from such sources point to 40-20-40 ratio – direct traffic,keyword centric and natural search referrals. For startups and early life enterprises, the ratio could be 25-35-40 pointing to a near 6X ratio. The swing across the range hovers between 4x to 6x ratio.

Without search engine, Google acknowledges advertisers would find other means of reaching consumers. We have to concede that search engines are not just merely capturing existing consumer spending rather they stimulate additional consumer spending(any online purchaser can vouch for this – they tend to buy more , owing to the dramatic increase in efficiencies and the smoothness of the operation). To be fair, Google’s true “economic impact” on a community should likely be measured in a way that balances the economic patterns it disrupts with the new-model of business it generates. Online ads and Google being the dominant player there are directly influencing the sale and retail mechanisms in a big way and are bound to increase their influence and hopefully, we will see the economic impact assessment methods improve a lot more along with the results.

Posted in Business, Featured Posts | Tagged AdSense, Emerging Trends, google | 1 Response

Charlene Li’s Book : Open Leadership

Charlene Li’s Book : Open Leadership

By Sadagopan on May 10, 2010

Charlene Li and Forrester’s Josh Bernoff earlier gave the pioneering book, “Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies”, which provided business a leg up to understand social technologies and consumer behaviors. (For the record : Charlene was amongst the well known Forrester Star who quit to start her own venture Altimeter Group with […]

Posted in Business, Featured Posts | Tagged Altimeter Group, Charlene Li, Emerging Trends, Leadership, Open Leadership, social technologies | 2 Responses

Enterprise Software : The Moments Of Pause

Enterprise Software : The Moments Of Pause

By Sadagopan on February 9, 2010

Image via Wikipedia SAP announced major executive board level changes on Sunday. Léo Apotheker moves out out as CEO and in comes Bill McDermott, head of the field operations, and Jim Hagemann Snabe, head of product development, who will now share the top job. Interestingly, SAP promoted Vishal Sika, chief technology officer (CTO) to the […]

Posted in Business | Tagged Emerging Trends, enterprise software, erp, sap

Smart Techology For The Smart Enterprise

Smart Techology For The Smart Enterprise

By Sadagopan on December 21, 2009

The web is abuzz with analyses on Google’s real time search effectiveness assessed in the context of the death of an Hollywood actress today. The question there is how real time is realtime? Google has demonstrated through algorithmic means(without…

Posted in Business | Tagged CEP, Emerging Technologies, Emerging Trends | 2 Responses

Cloud Computing & IT Spending!

Cloud Computing & IT Spending!

By Sadagopan on December 14, 2009

In continuation of the previous note:Involved discussions on cloud invariably turn towards the question: would embracing cloud help business bring down IT spend? This question assumes more relevance given the fast early adoptors are seen to be increas…

Posted in Business | Tagged Cloud Computing, Emerging Trends

The Cloud Adoption : Early Signs

The Cloud Adoption : Early Signs

By Sadagopan on December 11, 2009

Was in a closed door meet with some customers, influencers analyzing the state of the cloud computing market and the future directions including key players maturity, monetization and derivative impacts throughout the cloud landscape. The clear consens…

Posted in Trends & Concepts | Tagged analyst, cloud adoption, Cloud Computing, Emerging Trends, force.com, google, influencer, microsoft, salesforce.com | 1 Response

How Much Information & Overload Phenomenon!

How Much Information & Overload Phenomenon!

By Sadagopan on December 9, 2009

The Global Information Industry of the UCSD has put together statistics about how much information gets consumed by Americans every day. Two previous studies, by Peter Lyman and Hal Varian in 2000 and 2003, analyzed the quantity of original content cr…

Posted in Featured Posts, Trends & Concepts | Tagged Emerging Trends, High-definition television, Information overload, moore's law, research, RSS, Syndication and Feeds, Television, User Generated Content | 1 Response

Private Clouds : Real & Relevant?

Private Clouds : Real & Relevant?

By Sadagopan on December 9, 2009

An interesting thread is now on within the enterprise irregulars group on what constitutes private clouds –as again very enlightened discussion therein. The issue that I want to talk about is if private cloud do indeed exist, then what is their adop…

Posted in Business | Tagged Clouds, Emerging Technologies, Emerging Trends

Analog Dollars Onto Digital Dimes : Challenging Transitions

Analog Dollars Onto Digital Dimes : Challenging Transitions

By Sadagopan on December 6, 2009

I was in a meeting with a CIO in New York on Friday where he outlined the onslaught of disruptive innovation in his industry and the broad set of challenges faced therein. The magnitude of the change that his organization needed to face was mindbogglin…

Posted in Business | Tagged Business Models, Emerging Trends, innovation

IT Savvy Means Getting An Edge From IT

IT Savvy Means Getting An Edge From IT

By Sadagopan on December 2, 2009

As IT’s importance grows inside organizations, with more competition and concerns about ROI and BVIT, pressures on resourcing, offshoring strategies and heightened sense of expectations from IT by business, all enterprises undergo such changes and an a…

Posted in Business | Tagged BVIT, Emerging Trends

« PreviousNext »

feed mail facebook twitter linkedin

EI Tweets

My Tweets

Popular Posts

  • 2021 Roundup Of AI And Machine Learning Market Forecasts Show Strong Growth
  • Process Engine + Social Media -> Thingamy & ESME
  • A Conversation with Andrew McAfee
  • The Marginal Cost of Software
  • There Are No Stars On A Failed Project!
  • Software: Maintenance Revenue: High Margin or High Risk?
  • Google’s Woes and the Right to Be Pixilated
  • Getting chatbot fatigue? Then upgrade to digital associates...

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Authors

  • Anshu Sharma
  • Bob Warfield
  • Brian Sommer
  • Dave Kellogg
  • David Terrar
  • Denis Pombriant
  • Dion Hinchcliffe
  • Esteban Kolsky
  • Evangelos Simoudis
  • James Governor
  • Jason Corsello
  • Jason M. Lemkin
  • Louis Columbus
  • Michael Krigsman
  • Naomi Bloom
  • Paul Greenberg
  • Phil Fersht
  • R "Ray" Wang
  • Raju Vegesna
  • Ross Mayfield
  • Sameer Patel
  • Sandy Kemsley
  • Susan Scrupski
  • Thomas Otter
  • Tom Raftery
  • Vijay Vijayasankar
  • Vinnie Mirchandani
  • Zoli Erdos